Jump to content


Photo

What you would like your Z to look like?


  • Please log in to reply
528 replies to this topic

#81 Lynton

Lynton

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 537 posts
  • Location:Sunshine Coast Queensland

Posted 04 November 2006 - 08:52 AM

Back in the late 60's a sports car was a rag top, in the 70's it became a coupe, in the 80's it became a 2+2 in the 90's it became a sports sedan,
Back in the 70's a 2+2 was considered an older persons grand touring transport definetly not a sports car/coupe, then the RX8 wins sports car of the year recently!
I have given up on what determines a sports coupe/car.
If you like the shape...be happy and put your own stamp of approval on it!
I still like rag tops, I still like Coupes and I currently drive a 260Z 2+2 & a S15 200sx and occassionally a Z31 Californian I think we become to fussy. In the end it is all in the eyes of the beholder, so go drive an MX5 another great fun sports car! But really in the end I have a facination for Zeds! I think I need a stable of cars to stop me complaining geeez!
Lynton 8)

#82 Azon

Azon

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 145 posts
  • Location:Adelaide

Posted 04 November 2006 - 10:00 AM

Back in the late 60's a sports car was a rag top, in the 70's it became a coupe, in the 80's it became a 2+2 in the 90's it became a sports sedan,
Back in the 70's a 2+2 was considered an older persons grand touring transport definetly not a sports car/coupe, then the RX8 wins sports car of the year recently!
I have given up on what determines a sports coupe/car.
If you like the shape...be happy and put your own stamp of approval on it!
I still like rag tops, I still like Coupes and I currently drive a 260Z 2+2 & a S15 200sx and occassionally a Z31 Californian I think we become to fussy. In the end it is all in the eyes of the beholder, so go drive an MX5 another great fun sports car! But really in the end I have a facination for Zeds! I think I need a stable of cars to stop me complaining geeez!
Lynton 8)

Stuff the MX5 :shock: , try driving the AW11 MR2 :D - now thats one fun car that has unbelivable levels of grip and traction when you want it to.

#83 dave_hl

dave_hl

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 194 posts
  • Location:Mont Albert

Posted 04 November 2006 - 10:09 AM

NZeder had a 2 seater 280 i think i remember him telling me. i do love the shape of a 2 seater zed and if i ever got another one i think itd be a 2 seater, but seeing as im 19 and its my daily, it just makes an inpracticle car like the zed that much more practicle by being able to carry 3 times as many passengers if i really had to.

#84 RUSSJZ-ZED

RUSSJZ-ZED

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 41 posts
  • Location:Sydney Oz

Posted 04 November 2006 - 10:14 AM

That's the point, why bother with a back seat if it is useless.I've owned several that had them, just a bad compromise between a sports car and a people mover, and once you try to move a couple of people , you realise it's a padded parcel shelf.
Another personal opinion, everybody should own at least one ragtop , preferably English, they are the best leakers, first time it rains the learning curve begins. Forget the skin cancer, start with a good soaking!Ahhh.. the smell of rotting carpet,sparks from under the dash...
Also, a real roof is a bloody good thing to have when you are going down the road at 100Ks an hour upside-down.
Notice how many mx5s and BMW rag tops have rollbars that are lower than the head they are behind?The road will grind a few inches of bone off before they even start to work..smart.

#85 Toecutter

Toecutter

    The 2000+ club

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,272 posts
  • Location:Kensington, Victoria

Posted 03 December 2006 - 07:59 PM

Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image

#86 van

van

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 223 posts
  • Website:http://grandJDM.com
  • Location:melb.au

Posted 04 December 2006 - 08:08 AM

Never been a fan of the g-nose, but all beautiful examples nonetheless!

And on a lighter note... ;)

Posted Image

#87 Zeddophile

Zeddophile

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 987 posts
  • Location:Melbourne

Posted 04 December 2006 - 05:23 PM

gotta partially agree with you there Russ - everybody should own an older English car - something about headlights dropping out at 100km/h on a deserted highway that you just don't forget....also the wiring smoke that seems to escape at random times through the vents.

#88 NZeder

NZeder

    The 2000+ club

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,291 posts
  • Location:Auckland, NZ

Posted 04 December 2006 - 06:36 PM

NZeder had a 2 seater 280 i think i remember him telling me.

Correct - I did own one - should have kept that one too like so many other zeds I have owned :( maybe one day I will pickup another one they do come up for sale here in NZ every now and then.

#89 gav240z

gav240z

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • 12,399 posts
  • Website:http://www.viczcar.com
  • Location:Sydney NSW
  • Tagline:Jack of all trades, master of none.

Posted 04 December 2006 - 10:25 PM

Hey Sulio, love the maroon ZG with Watanabe's absolutely perfect.

Myself I think I'm going for something like this eventually.

The silver Z looks like a real possibility.

Attached Thumbnails

  • 680_.jpg
  • 679_.jpg


#90 sco_aus

sco_aus

    The 2000+ club

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,484 posts
  • Location:Canberra, ACT
  • Tagline:Scott

Posted 04 December 2006 - 11:56 PM

Hey im glad you posted the pic of the silver zed, i just got bolt on flares and was wondering what it would look like. Very similar siver too, except i dont have a front bar to add to the look (yet).

#91 Toecutter

Toecutter

    The 2000+ club

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,272 posts
  • Location:Kensington, Victoria

Posted 05 December 2006 - 09:24 AM

oooh the silver does look nice!

#92 thehelix112

thehelix112

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 167 posts
  • Location:Ballarat, Victoria.

Posted 06 December 2006 - 11:38 AM

Love this white S30Z. Makes almost 400HP from an NA L28 :).


Gotta ask for more details and/or proof of that. Sounds like a big load of bullshit to me.

Dave

#93 NZeder

NZeder

    The 2000+ club

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,291 posts
  • Location:Auckland, NZ

Posted 06 December 2006 - 12:04 PM

Love this white S30Z. Makes almost 400HP from an NA L28 :).


Gotta ask for more details and/or proof of that. Sounds like a big load of bullshit to me.

Dave

No all true - The engine is not really a L28 anymore - runs a lot of Kameari Engine Works internals including the custom fully counter weighted 83mm stroker with 138mm rods and some light 89mm pistons. It also has TWM triple throttle bodies and ATI Super Damper. He has blown a few engines over the years and in 2004 his dyno showed 300-310ps at the wheels = 400HP at the flywheel. Here is the dyno sheet.Posted Image

I think it is running 11.5:1 and the head has 38cc cambers running big lift/duration.

This year he changed his header for a new 6-1 drag header (looks like a Kameari unit - not cheap) and made 328PS at the wheels.

So yes it is a 400HP L28 only 328PS at the wheels :) big :)

#94 thehelix112

thehelix112

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 167 posts
  • Location:Ballarat, Victoria.

Posted 07 December 2006 - 12:11 AM

NZeder,

That dyno sheet doesn't work for me. What RPM is max power at? Or can you fix the link?

According to my calculations 328rwps is around 380fwhp. Still mighty impressive.

Dave

#95 thehelix112

thehelix112

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 167 posts
  • Location:Ballarat, Victoria.

Posted 07 December 2006 - 01:33 AM

I would just like to preface this post with my view that dynos are particularly useless for comparing hp values.

On the sheet you tried to link to which can be found towards the bottom of this page http://zhp.satokikak...0/z21/index.htm
there is indeed a dyno sheet there that indicates 328ps. I really wish I could read Japanese (or that babel was working), because I can't see anywhere indicating that is rear wheel hp. If it is crank hp, multiplying it by a standardish conversion factor (85%) gives us around 275hp.

Which is inline with another page, where it is clearly rwhp, the dyno indicates a more realistic maximum ps of 275.5 at around 6700 http://zhp.satokikak...0/z26/index.htm

That is much more believable.

The head on that car is basically stock and doesn't look anywhere near 400hp capable to my (inexperienced) eyes.

FWIW one theoretical maximum I have calculated from the high flow figure for a L intake valve I have heard of puts the maximum hp at 390, with a 3.0L engine making this power at close to 11000rpm.

I know such calculators aren't worth their salt, but there is too much of a discrepancy between that and what you are telling me, so I get suspicious.

Dave

#96 NZeder

NZeder

    The 2000+ club

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,291 posts
  • Location:Auckland, NZ

Posted 07 December 2006 - 08:49 PM

Thanks Dave that make a lot more sence now - 328ps crank and 275rwhp and this does work with the dyno's screen shots shown :) like you find it hard to work out the language with the aid of bable etc but then alot of the time is still hard to workout the translation. Like you these figures are more workable with a Zed head in NA format - now if it was boosted then much bigger numbers would be seen (if build for boost :))

Cheers
Mike

#97 juxstapo

juxstapo

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts
  • Location:Georgia, USA

Posted 24 December 2006 - 03:49 AM

Oh lord why did I ever click on this thread? :oops: My shoulder devil and angel are locked in mortal combat now:

:twisted: Mod Cars!
:D Put kids through college!
:twisted: Mod Cars!
:D Put kids through college!

#98 ZD44TT

ZD44TT

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 499 posts
  • Location:Sydney

Posted 17 February 2007 - 08:22 AM

guys anymore pics of this car?

Posted Image

using it as a guide .

#99 JP

JP

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 157 posts
  • Location:Melbourne

Posted 17 February 2007 - 09:14 PM

I have seen this car before, very nice.

Many of the cars from RockyAuto are quite nice and nearly all of them are for sale if you have a spare $50,000. However if you look closely there are often a lot of imperfections, if you thought quality body work was a dying thing in Australia then it is barely hanging on by a thread in Japan.

I was hoping drop by the workshop sometime soon, if I do I will grab some more photos.

Here are some older photos I took:
http://www.classiczc...light=rockyauto

#100 ZD44TT

ZD44TT

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 499 posts
  • Location:Sydney

Posted 17 February 2007 - 10:02 PM

I have seen this car before, very nice.

Many of the cars from RockyAuto are quite nice and nearly all of them are for sale if you have a spare $50,000. However if you look closely there are often a lot of imperfections, if you thought quality body work was a dying thing in Australia then it is barely hanging on by a thread in Japan.

I was hoping drop by the workshop sometime soon, if I do I will grab some more photos.

Here are some older photos I took:
http://www.classiczc...light=rockyauto




my god your photos .............*DROOOOOOOL* hahahhaha......

I will defly go back to Japan.......this time for a purpose.........been there twice in the last 3 years for holidays.

Where abouts is the shop JP?..........

Anyone know where I an get these mirrors from?

http://www.classiczc...44&d=1133136346

http://www.classiczc...42&d=1133136334




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users