now, its easy to be smart in hindsight and marketing and customer segmentation has moved on in the last 50 years or so. this would be the layout that would have worked around the globe, with very little development cost 1. standard L24 - move along, nothing to see, economy version, fast enough to see off the competition of the day eg MGs, Triumphs. I find the 6 cylinder MGC a particularly humorous effort, even for the day 2. mid range - increase to 2.8 fit triple SUs. This would have been within reach of the e-type ( next level competition) 3.A introduce the twin head cam on top of the L28 - which they didn't do until the 80s. More $s 3.B one with the president 4L Y40 v8 197 hp/323 nm - for a beefy premium, this could have been the performance leader. the ex prince 6 was never going to cut the mustard and looking over the blueprints, it looks like an expensive to produce engine. with the v8, this would have been the queen-killer, ballpark with the e-type, mustangs and corvettes For this version, I would add discs at the back and the larger 260-size brake booster. And now would be the time to beef up the shell eg ,longer frame rails, thicker sheetmetal on the rear pillars this is the route that ford have done with the current mustangs, although they only 3 flavours - the 4 cyl, the V8 and the hot V8
So Enzo - #1 is the answer to the oil crisis problem