Leaderboard

Well, As in the first photo, I did have the Speedhole ebay ones you've linked. They look mount and feel like the $100 you pay for them. and are completely different to the originals? =/ Original mirrors would be nice. certainly. However at least on my build, I am sure not many will look past the modern Kia paint, rb30/26, Carbon seats and wonder why I didn't spend $1500-2000 bucks on some perfect original fender mirrors. I'm hoping these mirrors, Will at least blend in to the look, Not be a total eye sore on the finished car. (Like the plastic speedhole ebay ones are) I believe when I looked he had them as all polished, or black and polished as I purchased. I bought these with the intention of painting the polished part. However looking at them, Not going to bother making the change

The body & all the panels have now been rubbed to 400g, so it's now ready for paint - which will happen next weekend. I'm determined to have it back to Mr S before Christmas!

Inside of the guards have had stone ship applied, and along with the inside of the doors & hatch, had a coat of colour laid down:

New rear vision mirrors were mounted:

Mr S wanted his big Wang removed and the smaller sports option style Wang fitted instead. We removed the big Wang only to discover many, many holes, filler and rust: e So we decided to strip the paint and filler off outside: Oh dear... Rather than try and weld up the holes in the very thin (0.7mm) deck panel then spend hours panel beating it straight, we decided to make a new deck panel from some new 1mm sheet steel:

Thanks for adding a link here Gav. Some people might wonder quite why I'm so 'exercised' regarding the concept, design, engineering and production of these cars, and perhaps why I seem so frustrated and forceful on the topic. The backstory is that - since I first became interested in these cars - I have always seen and read all that "Made For The USA" and "An American Car, Made In Japan" type narrative from the so-called Z gurus and historians. It just never made any sense to me - and from talking to some of the people involved in Japan I knew it wasn't accurate - but there's still not a week that goes by when I don't hear the echoes of that narrative in one way or another. Yes, of course the massive potential market in North America - the USA and the West Coast in particular - was a KEY part of the planning for the Z, but it was not the whole story. Some of the USA-based Z 'gurus' have tried for many years to tell us that the USA market HLS30U 'Datsun 240Z' was the sole driver in concept, design and engineering, and that other markets and other variants were an afterthought. That is - quite simply - a lie. The documents that my friend Kats Endo obtained from Hitoshi Uemura (chief engineer on the 'Maru Z' project) illustrate the fact that Nissan saw the new S30-series Z as a 'family' of models for domestic and export sales, that all of them were designed at the same time and that all of the different variants influenced each other. Anybody who knows the cars well enough should be able to see that already, but all that "Made For The USA" marketing talk got into the press from the very beginning and is now pretty much set in stone. Journalists repeat it in almost every new article. Nissan took the Australian market seriously. They took the NZ market seriously too. These markets were not as easy for them as the USA market was, but they mattered. An Australian/NZ market variant of the Z was part of the plan from the beginning. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise.