I think all of those comparisons are ridiculously biased... comparing a van to a semi sports car and a harley to a sports bike...
The engine needs to have more tourque for these two because they weigh so much and have very little need for high RPM
power.
You can rev the crap out of an L28 if you wanna chuck a crazy cam in there... Cams are pretty cheap. I think its just a bit
misleading to say that the L24 is superior simply because it revs higher. By this merit a rotary is the best engine in the
world. Most people like hp and torque. I am in the middle and like hp. I really cant stand Falcodores and the like. They
weigh a ton so they have limited handling characteristics, BUT they would be a ton of fun to drive simply for the power.
240's and 260's weigh near on nothing compared to cars these days and yeah, you're going to add a little more weight
to the car putting in a L24, but surely it wouldn't be more than 30kg?
I've heard people complain that a car might have heaps of power but it has no torque so its not so great for the streets,
which i can understand, each to their own. I'd prefer more power over ease of driving. But to prefer more RPM over power
is a rather unusual bias.
I get it high RPM's are fun, i have an MR2 that makes diddely squat under 3k, has peak torque at 5k and max power just
over 7k. Hell yeah I'd prefer this over a similar 2L engine that put out the same power at a lower rpm, but trading rpm for
more power just makes sense. (When it doesn't add a ton of weight)