Lighter, stiffer rockers will always help with valve control. But no not really, valve control and 'wild ramp rates' (which I assume you mean Intensity?) are functions of the acceleration curve.
For Intensity (degrees it takes to open the valve X mm), maximum acceleration is limited on a finger follower with radiused pad like the L by how deep inverted radius (or negative curvature) you can grind on the cam. This is why you see modern OHC roller valvetrains have a massive inverted radii on the cam and have to be ground on special cam grinders with small grinding wheels. This is to try get back some valve acceleration they have lost over a bucket flat-tappet valvetrain design (which have no such acceleration limitation).
For valve control, you could reduce/widen the negative acceleration over the nose with a lighter rocker and gain some valve time-area (less spring pressure needed). But really that is splitting hairs and no ones valvetrain is that developed unless you spend time on a Spintron.
If you could change the rocker ratio then yes you could get some more acceleration at the valve for a given cam, this would require moving the cam axis though.