@ $690 per carb and $700 for a decent manifold + dyno time how could it be 1/4 the cost. I know ITB's and a state of the art ECU + ancillaries will be much more expensive, but 4X? I've heard so many times on this forum that smooth idle, less emissions and such aren't worth the extra $, I thought that the most power through the greatest efficiency and lowest emissions with the smoothest operation was the goal of anyone serious about the internal combustion engine. I remember arguing with someone about forced induction and remember them saying " it's only for race cars that don't care about fuel economy" so that's why the diesel electric trains that operate up north are both turbo charged and super charged, because they don't care about economy? I'm a Le Mans fanatic and you can bet that economy wins races. Anyone that knows anything about engines should know that the higher the compression ratio the better the economy and power for a given amount of fuel, that's where precise fuel delivery comes in, detonation kills engines. When I was a kid a 10:1 comp ratio was considered high, now 10:1 is inefficient by most OEM standards as fuel metering as well as precise ignition timing with a good Knock sensor just in case allows higher compression ratios safely.